Google Glass: a promise too far ahead of its time
Premium smart glasses – When Google Glass appeared, they embodied a powerful vision: overlaying useful information onto reality, capturing images on the fly, navigating without taking out a smartphone. At the time, the concept seemed futuristic; its execution, however, encountered a double obstacle. On the one hand, the technology was still immature: limited battery life, overheating, a discreet but imperfect display, and questionable ergonomics. On the other hand, there was immediate social rejection, rarely so pronounced for a consumer product. The wearer became a walking symbol, not of innovation, but of suspicion.
The unease stems as much from the design as from what it symbolizes. An asymmetrical frame, a visible module, a camera perceived as always-on: even when switched off, first-generation smart glasses give the impression of recording. The fear isn't theoretical; it's embedded in everyday life, in a café, an open-plan office, a museum. A single nickname suffices to summarize the cultural divide: the object creates distance rather than connection. Augmented reality (AR), understood as the addition of digital elements to the field of vision, is associated with intrusion, not enchantment.
Why does the story change fifteen years later?
The return of smart glasses
The rest awaits you
Join the Luxe Daily Private Circle and gain access to the full article, complete archives and exclusive selections from our editorial team.
- Everything about the Reader plan
- Exclusive shopping selection
- Event invitations
- Everything about the Connoisseur plan
- Early access to articles
- Daily newsletter